Hot Topics

Syria: The U.S. Acting As Judge, Jury, and Executioner Ahead of OPWC Investigation in Douma

In my latest interview with Radio Sputnik on April 10th, I discussed how the United States is not waiting for verification from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) before placing blame on the Syrian army and the Syrian government for yet another staged production by the AlQaeda White Helmets, this time in Douma.  I also explained how motive and benefit clearly lie with the terrorist factions and not with the Syrian government.

You can read the transcript of the interview on Sputnik News.

 

 

Per Southfront, “on April 10, the UN Security Council failed to approve three draft resolutions on chemical weapons attacks. Russia vetoed a US text, while two Russian-drafted resolutions did not get nine votes to pass. However, the OPCW will send two expert teams to Syria to probe the alleged attack later this week. Despite this, US President Donald Trump once again threatened to strike Syria on April 11.”

 

 

Prior to any conclusions or irrefutable evidence from an OPCW investigation, the United States is attempting to justify that it is within its rights to take whatever action it deems necessary in Syria, including military intervention.  The absurd amount of narcissism that is seeping through statements being made by the United States defies logic.

 

Finally a message from the Syrian people to Trump.

Featured Image Source.

About Sarah Abed (110 Articles)
Independent journalist and political commentator. Focused on exposing the lies and propaganda in mainstream media news, as it relates to domestic and foreign policy with an emphasis on the Middle East. Contributed to various radio shows, news publications and spoken at forums. For media inquiries please email sarahabed84@gmail.com.

6 Comments on Syria: The U.S. Acting As Judge, Jury, and Executioner Ahead of OPWC Investigation in Douma

  1. Just currently found you dear..thank you for speaking out 🙂

    Liked by 3 people

  2. As I’m searching what’s the real happening in Syria cause I know there’s something’s weird. Glad to found you.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. U.S. President Lyndon Johnson went on prime time television and told a national audience an outright lie about the false flag Gulf of Tonkin incident in Vietnam, knowing all along it was a criminal lie, and in the years following millions of Vietnamese and 60,000 American soldiers died.

    Donald Trump’s public statement about leaving Syria “very soon … very soon” was identical in nature – a blatant, planned grand-scale deception, as was “Assad can stay” a year ago – to Johnson’s lying through his teeth to the American people, and the world.

    Liked by 3 people

    • It really is continually astounding to me that this BS still works after decades++++ of use on the public. I used to be dubious about US government pronouncements, but I never believed that they were complete, utter, self-serving lies on a regular basis. It’s like people (formerly me) feel comfortable being told what and how to think (dupes; Milgram Experiment kinda stuff; there are polls that actually show that people defer their own self-interest to others who they come to believe are better “capable” of serving their self-interest, despite their own increasingly diminishing existence/their own “lyin’ eyes”; so that’s the focus and fulcrum of manipulating public opinion). Looking back, I feel such the fool now, but that kind of/my realization is accelerating generally. Something’s gotta/gonna change.

      NOTHING is to be believed, except on sites like this one. Or at least using sites like this to form discerning questions for the conventional wisdom.

      (Thanks again, Sarah.)

      Like

  4. Simultaneously, literally, Heather Nauert (State Department spox) and Mattis (US SecDef) said, respectively, “we have proof…” and “there is no proof…”. They both can’t be right (i.e. one of them is lying through their teeth).

    Unfortunately, wrt to Syria, both cannot be right but both can be in service of the same goal. Nauert can be stating the intention/rationale, and Mattis can be masking the timing.

    I hope not, but the discourse on Syria has become so insane that it’s really hard to tell.

    God Bless you Sarah.

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: